Conversation
|
isn't this already in the google fonts package? |
|
You're right, I didn’t realize it was already included in the How should I proceed in this case? Should I still use In parallel, I’m currently reviewing the dependent builds for
I’ll continue checking the remaining ones and update the results as I go. |
|
As an additional note, both patches They are still required at this point to ensure successful compilation on musl systems. |
|
Merge font roboto-mono into roboto. Puts those fonts into |
|
I finished merging the fonts into a single template and placed both font families under Most dependent packages build successfully with the updated NASM, but a few issues were identified:
I’m currently looking into the edk2-ovmf issue to identify what caused the breakage after the update. How should I proceed with the packages that were already broken before this change? |
I think its just a whitespace issue if you are copy + pasting that patch, I was able to reproduce failing to apply when using |
|
You were right, the patch from your link applied perfectly and fixed the build. Thanks! |
|
Before moving this PR to Ready to Review, I made the following adjustments:
All other dependent packages build correctly, and the update appears stable. |
eed2fe7 to
8dd74df
Compare
8763f61 to
b7ca2bd
Compare
|
Marking this PR as draft for now. |
|
This PR has been updated with the following changes:
Marking as ready for review. |
Testing the changes
Local build testing