Make planck more useful (Proposal 26)#24
Conversation
|
I don't like how this changes people's documents without warning. I'm still a bit conflicted on whether that's just a necessary evil or whether we should look into adding some kind of ad-hoc warning in typst before making this change here... |
|
I guess we could split this into multiple phases if we really want to make sure it does not break people's documents:
I'm not sure it would be worth spanning this over three versions, but if it breaks many documents, I think this is the only way to make a progressive change. |
|
Hmm..... It may be a bit dumb, but that's probably the most robust way to go about it. The more I think about it, the more I actually like the idea. @laurmaedje would you say this is warranted or is it overkill? |
|
Very similar to what I proposed here for For |
|
All this would have to be done on Typst's side, tough. Codex does not have the ability to express such precise warnings. |
|
After another brief discussion of this on discord, I'll drop my concern for this, so LGTM. |
|
To be clear, what the next Typst changelog should mention is that |
Description
This PR implements Proposal 26 (iteration 1) from the Symbol Proposals document. It changes
planckto ħ (which gets italicized to ℏ in math thanks to typst/typst#5492), and removes theplanck.reducevariant. For more context, see the discussion on Discord.There is no way to take advantage of the symbol deprecation mechanism introduced in #19 to make this change smoother.
Breaking changes (cc. @laurmaedje)
planck.reducebecomes invalid, andplanckchanges codepoint.