Skip to content

Comments

docs: Add complete SIP-010 fungible token implementation example#1808

Closed
Earnwithalee7890 wants to merge 1 commit intostacks-network:masterfrom
Earnwithalee7890:add-sip010-token-example
Closed

docs: Add complete SIP-010 fungible token implementation example#1808
Earnwithalee7890 wants to merge 1 commit intostacks-network:masterfrom
Earnwithalee7890:add-sip010-token-example

Conversation

@Earnwithalee7890
Copy link

Description

Adds a comprehensive SIP-010 fungible token example to help developers implement the standard correctly.

Changes

  • ✅ Complete SIP-010 implementation with all required trait functions
  • ✅ Practical usage examples (minting, transferring, checking balances)
  • ✅ Deployment and testing instructions
  • ✅ Best practices and customization guide
  • ✅ Security considerations (access control, validation)

Why This Helps

Many developers ask for complete, working SIP-010 examples. This provides:

  • Production-ready reference implementation
  • Clear explanation of each function
  • Testing and deployment guidance
  • Common customization patterns

Testing

  • Contract code compiles with Clarinet
  • All SIP-010 trait functions correctly implemented
  • Examples are clear and runnable
  • Documentation is comprehensive

Related

  • Addresses community requests for token implementation examples
  • Complements existing SIP-010 trait documentation
  • Helps onboard new Clarity developers

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Jan 29, 2026

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@eric-stacks
Copy link
Collaborator

there are already 3 instances in the docs that walkthrough a SIP-010 FT implementation.

Also, the changes in this PR does not materially impact the original content. Going forwards, we are looking for PRs that have a positive material impact or a value add. Content that is deemed redundant and/or generated by AI will not be accepted.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants