Skip to content

Conversation

@tcarmet
Copy link
Contributor

@tcarmet tcarmet commented Dec 19, 2025

No description provided.

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Dec 19, 2025

Hello tcarmet,

My role is to assist you with the merge of this
pull request. Please type @bert-e help to get information
on this process, or consult the user documentation.

Available options
name description privileged authored
/after_pull_request Wait for the given pull request id to be merged before continuing with the current one.
/bypass_author_approval Bypass the pull request author's approval
/bypass_build_status Bypass the build and test status
/bypass_commit_size Bypass the check on the size of the changeset TBA
/bypass_incompatible_branch Bypass the check on the source branch prefix
/bypass_jira_check Bypass the Jira issue check
/bypass_peer_approval Bypass the pull request peers' approval
/bypass_leader_approval Bypass the pull request leaders' approval
/approve Instruct Bert-E that the author has approved the pull request. ✍️
/create_pull_requests Allow the creation of integration pull requests.
/create_integration_branches Allow the creation of integration branches.
/no_octopus Prevent Wall-E from doing any octopus merge and use multiple consecutive merge instead
/unanimity Change review acceptance criteria from one reviewer at least to all reviewers
/wait Instruct Bert-E not to run until further notice.
Available commands
name description privileged
/help Print Bert-E's manual in the pull request.
/status Print Bert-E's current status in the pull request TBA
/clear Remove all comments from Bert-E from the history TBA
/retry Re-start a fresh build TBA
/build Re-start a fresh build TBA
/force_reset Delete integration branches & pull requests, and restart merge process from the beginning.
/reset Try to remove integration branches unless there are commits on them which do not appear on the source branch.

Status report is not available.

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Dec 19, 2025

Incorrect fix version

The Fix Version/s in issue S3UTILS-211 contains:

  • None

Considering where you are trying to merge, I ignored possible hotfix versions and I expected to find:

  • 1.16.5

Please check the Fix Version/s of S3UTILS-211, or the target
branch of this pull request.

@tcarmet tcarmet force-pushed the feature/S3UTILS-211-configurable-replication-status branch from b3dbdcf to d0ba580 Compare December 19, 2025 22:41
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 19, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 87.62887% with 12 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 17.07%. Comparing base (5bcb71a) to head (5f47aa7).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
listObjectsByReplicationStatus.js 87.62% 12 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@                 Coverage Diff                  @@
##           development/1.16     #359      +/-   ##
====================================================
+ Coverage             15.65%   17.07%   +1.42%     
====================================================
  Files                    82       82              
  Lines                  5718     5751      +33     
  Branches               1208     1213       +5     
====================================================
+ Hits                    895      982      +87     
+ Misses                 4754     4700      -54     
  Partials                 69       69              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@tcarmet tcarmet force-pushed the feature/S3UTILS-211-configurable-replication-status branch from 4d333af to cc335ba Compare December 22, 2025 22:22
@tcarmet tcarmet force-pushed the feature/S3UTILS-211-configurable-replication-status branch 2 times, most recently from ec77093 to 283b5e0 Compare December 23, 2025 22:13
@tcarmet tcarmet force-pushed the feature/S3UTILS-211-configurable-replication-status branch from 286b531 to 5f47aa7 Compare December 23, 2025 22:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants