Update LastModified date format to ISO string in XML response by ZiyangLinScality · Pull Request #6085 · scality/cloudserver

ZiyangLinScality · 2026-02-23T14:59:55Z

When browsing objects created by Veeam SOSAPI, the UI shows "An error occurred while loading data" even though the API returns a 200 response with valid XML.

Root cause: The LastModified field in the response uses RFC 2822 format (Mon, 23 Feb 2026 08:24:20 GMT) instead of ISO 8601 (2026-02-23T08:24:20.000Z). AWS SDK v3 strictly expects RFC 3339/ISO 8601 and throws TypeError: Invalid RFC3339 timestamp format during deserialization, causing the entire response to fail.

bert-e · 2026-02-23T14:59:59Z

Hello ziyanglinscality,

My role is to assist you with the merge of this
pull request. Please type @bert-e help to get information
on this process, or consult the user documentation.

Available options

name	description	privileged	authored
`/after_pull_request`	Wait for the given pull request id to be merged before continuing with the current one.
`/bypass_author_approval`	Bypass the pull request author's approval	⭐
`/bypass_build_status`	Bypass the build and test status	⭐
`/bypass_commit_size`	Bypass the check on the size of the changeset `TBA`	⭐
`/bypass_incompatible_branch`	Bypass the check on the source branch prefix	⭐
`/bypass_jira_check`	Bypass the Jira issue check	⭐
`/bypass_peer_approval`	Bypass the pull request peers' approval	⭐
`/bypass_leader_approval`	Bypass the pull request leaders' approval	⭐
`/approve`	Instruct Bert-E that the author has approved the pull request.		✍️
`/create_pull_requests`	Allow the creation of integration pull requests.
`/create_integration_branches`	Allow the creation of integration branches.
`/no_octopus`	Prevent Wall-E from doing any octopus merge and use multiple consecutive merge instead
`/unanimity`	Change review acceptance criteria from `one reviewer at least` to `all reviewers`
`/wait`	Instruct Bert-E not to run until further notice.

Available commands

name	description	privileged
`/help`	Print Bert-E's manual in the pull request.
`/status`	Print Bert-E's current status in the pull request `TBA`
`/clear`	Remove all comments from Bert-E from the history `TBA`
`/retry`	Re-start a fresh build `TBA`
`/build`	Re-start a fresh build `TBA`
`/force_reset`	Delete integration branches & pull requests, and restart merge process from the beginning.
`/reset`	Try to remove integration branches unless there are commits on them which do not appear on the source branch.

Status report is not available.

bert-e · 2026-02-23T15:05:39Z

Waiting for approval

The following approvals are needed before I can proceed with the merge:

the author
2 peers

codecov · 2026-02-23T15:10:01Z

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 84.26%. Comparing base (2a7a68f) to head (6002c51).
⚠️ Report is 5 commits behind head on development/9.3.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
lib/routes/veeam/list.js	`97.50% <ø> (ø)`

... and 3 files with indirect coverage changes

@@                 Coverage Diff                 @@
##           development/9.3    #6085      +/-   ##
===================================================
- Coverage            84.31%   84.26%   -0.05%     
===================================================
  Files                  206      206              
  Lines                13251    13251              
===================================================
- Hits                 11172    11166       -6     
- Misses                2079     2085       +6

Flag	Coverage Δ
file-ft-tests	`67.90% <ø> (-0.02%)`	⬇️
kmip-ft-tests	`28.08% <ø> (-0.04%)`	⬇️
mongo-v0-ft-tests	`69.13% <ø> (ø)`
mongo-v1-ft-tests	`69.22% <ø> (ø)`
multiple-backend	`35.10% <ø> (ø)`
sur-tests	`35.63% <ø> (-0.04%)`	⬇️
sur-tests-inflights	`37.49% <ø> (ø)`
unit	`69.90% <ø> (ø)`
utapi-v2-tests	`34.36% <ø> (ø)`

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

bert-e · 2026-02-23T17:11:17Z

Incorrect fix version

The Fix Version/s in issue CLDSRV-857 contains:

9.3.4

Considering where you are trying to merge, I ignored possible hotfix versions and I expected to find:

9.3.5

Please check the Fix Version/s of CLDSRV-857, or the target
branch of this pull request.

DarkIsDude

We should have test somehow 🙏

anurag4DSB

Lets add the test and then we should be good.

lib/routes/veeam/list.js

Add a regression test that captures the XML body from the LIST route and verifies all LastModified values match ISO 8601 format, preventing the RFC 2822 date format bug from recurring.

ZiyangLinScality · 2026-02-24T11:24:55Z

/approve

bert-e · 2026-02-24T11:25:03Z

Incorrect fix version

The Fix Version/s in issue CLDSRV-857 contains:

9.3.4

Considering where you are trying to merge, I ignored possible hotfix versions and I expected to find:

9.3.5

Please check the Fix Version/s of CLDSRV-857, or the target
branch of this pull request.

The following options are set: approve

ZiyangLinScality · 2026-02-24T11:25:41Z

/status

bert-e · 2026-02-24T11:25:46Z

Status

Status report is not available.

The following options are set: approve

bert-e · 2026-02-24T11:25:58Z

In the queue

The changeset has received all authorizations and has been added to the
relevant queue(s). The queue(s) will be merged in the target development
branch(es) as soon as builds have passed.

The changeset will be merged in:

✔️ development/9.3

The following branches will NOT be impacted:

development/7.10
development/7.4
development/7.70
development/8.8
development/9.0
development/9.1
development/9.2

There is no action required on your side. You will be notified here once
the changeset has been merged. In the unlikely event that the changeset
fails permanently on the queue, a member of the admin team will
contact you to help resolve the matter.

IMPORTANT

Please do not attempt to modify this pull request.

Any commit you add on the source branch will trigger a new cycle after the
current queue is merged.
Any commit you add on one of the integration branches will be lost.

If you need this pull request to be removed from the queue, please contact a
member of the admin team now.

The following options are set: approve

bert-e · 2026-02-24T11:47:18Z

Queue build failed

The corresponding build for the queue failed:

Checkout the status page.
Identify the failing build and review the logs.
If no issue is found, re-run the build.
If an issue is identified, checkout the steps below to remove
the pull request from the queue for further analysis and maybe rebase/merge.

Remove the pull request from the queue

Add a /wait comment on this pull request.
Click on login on the status page.
Go into the manage page.
Find the option called Rebuild the queue and click on it.
Bert-E will loop again on all pull requests to put the valid ones
in the queue again, while skipping the one with the /wait comment.
Wait for the new queue to merge, then merge/rebase your pull request
with the latest changes to then work on a proper fix.
Once the issue is fixed, delete the /wait comment and
follow the usual process to merge the pull request.

bert-e · 2026-02-24T13:29:17Z

I have successfully merged the changeset of this pull request
into targetted development branches:

✔️ development/9.3

The following branches have NOT changed:

development/7.10
development/7.4
development/7.70
development/8.8
development/9.0
development/9.1
development/9.2

Please check the status of the associated issue CLDSRV-857.

Goodbye ziyanglinscality.

This comment was marked as resolved.

Sign in to view

ZiyangLinScality changed the base branch from development/9.2 to development/9.3 February 23, 2026 15:04

Update LastModified date format to ISO string in XML response

adc7c94

ZiyangLinScality force-pushed the bugfix/CLDSRV-857/last-modified-format branch from 391b803 to adc7c94 Compare February 23, 2026 15:05

scality deleted a comment from bert-e Feb 23, 2026

benzekrimaha approved these changes Feb 24, 2026

View reviewed changes

DarkIsDude reviewed Feb 24, 2026

View reviewed changes

anurag4DSB reviewed Feb 24, 2026

View reviewed changes

lib/routes/veeam/list.js Show resolved Hide resolved

test: assert LastModified is ISO 8601 in LIST XML response

6002c51

Add a regression test that captures the XML body from the LIST route and verifies all LastModified values match ISO 8601 format, preventing the RFC 2822 date format bug from recurring.

ZiyangLinScality force-pushed the bugfix/CLDSRV-857/last-modified-format branch from 4f11a1f to 6002c51 Compare February 24, 2026 09:55

ZiyangLinScality requested review from DarkIsDude and anurag4DSB February 24, 2026 09:57

anurag4DSB approved these changes Feb 24, 2026

View reviewed changes

DarkIsDude approved these changes Feb 24, 2026

View reviewed changes

bert-e merged commit 9684045 into development/9.3 Feb 24, 2026
48 of 51 checks passed

bert-e deleted the bugfix/CLDSRV-857/last-modified-format branch February 24, 2026 13:29

Comments

Conversation

ZiyangLinScality commented Feb 23, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

bert-e commented Feb 23, 2026

Hello ziyanglinscality,

Uh oh!

This comment was marked as resolved.

bert-e commented Feb 23, 2026

Waiting for approval

Uh oh!

codecov bot commented Feb 23, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

bert-e commented Feb 23, 2026

Incorrect fix version

Uh oh!

DarkIsDude left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

anurag4DSB left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

ZiyangLinScality commented Feb 24, 2026

Uh oh!

bert-e commented Feb 24, 2026

Incorrect fix version

Uh oh!

ZiyangLinScality commented Feb 24, 2026

Uh oh!

bert-e commented Feb 24, 2026

Status

Uh oh!

bert-e commented Feb 24, 2026

In the queue

Uh oh!

bert-e commented Feb 24, 2026

Queue build failed

Uh oh!

bert-e commented Feb 24, 2026

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

5 participants

ZiyangLinScality commented Feb 23, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codecov bot commented Feb 23, 2026 •

edited

Loading