Skip to content

Conversation

@tmacro
Copy link
Contributor

@tmacro tmacro commented Dec 17, 2025

No description provided.

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Dec 17, 2025

Hello tmacro,

My role is to assist you with the merge of this
pull request. Please type @bert-e help to get information
on this process, or consult the user documentation.

Available options
name description privileged authored
/after_pull_request Wait for the given pull request id to be merged before continuing with the current one.
/bypass_author_approval Bypass the pull request author's approval
/bypass_build_status Bypass the build and test status
/bypass_commit_size Bypass the check on the size of the changeset TBA
/bypass_incompatible_branch Bypass the check on the source branch prefix
/bypass_jira_check Bypass the Jira issue check
/bypass_peer_approval Bypass the pull request peers' approval
/bypass_leader_approval Bypass the pull request leaders' approval
/approve Instruct Bert-E that the author has approved the pull request. ✍️
/create_pull_requests Allow the creation of integration pull requests.
/create_integration_branches Allow the creation of integration branches.
/no_octopus Prevent Wall-E from doing any octopus merge and use multiple consecutive merge instead
/unanimity Change review acceptance criteria from one reviewer at least to all reviewers
/wait Instruct Bert-E not to run until further notice.
Available commands
name description privileged
/help Print Bert-E's manual in the pull request.
/status Print Bert-E's current status in the pull request TBA
/clear Remove all comments from Bert-E from the history TBA
/retry Re-start a fresh build TBA
/build Re-start a fresh build TBA
/force_reset Delete integration branches & pull requests, and restart merge process from the beginning.
/reset Try to remove integration branches unless there are commits on them which do not appear on the source branch.

Status report is not available.

@scality scality deleted a comment from bert-e Dec 17, 2025
@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Dec 17, 2025

Waiting for approval

The following approvals are needed before I can proceed with the merge:

  • the author

  • 2 peers

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 17, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 84.39%. Comparing base (c8fe018) to head (d761a3a).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on development/9.2.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
lib/api/api.js 89.91% <100.00%> (+0.04%) ⬆️
lib/metadata/metadataUtils.js 90.90% <ø> (ø)
lib/server.js 81.18% <100.00%> (+2.08%) ⬆️

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

@@                 Coverage Diff                 @@
##           development/9.2    #6034      +/-   ##
===================================================
+ Coverage            84.34%   84.39%   +0.04%     
===================================================
  Files                  204      204              
  Lines                12926    12928       +2     
===================================================
+ Hits                 10903    10910       +7     
+ Misses                2023     2018       -5     
Flag Coverage Δ
file-ft-tests 67.43% <66.66%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
kmip-ft-tests 28.15% <66.66%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
mongo-v0-ft-tests 68.68% <66.66%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
mongo-v1-ft-tests 68.69% <66.66%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
multiple-backend 35.32% <66.66%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
sur-tests 36.45% <66.66%> (+0.80%) ⬆️
sur-tests-inflights 37.46% <66.66%> (-0.03%) ⬇️
unit 69.92% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
utapi-v2-tests 34.56% <66.66%> (+0.21%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Dec 17, 2025

Waiting for approval

The following approvals are needed before I can proceed with the merge:

  • the author

  • 2 peers

@scality scality deleted a comment from bert-e Dec 17, 2025
@tmacro
Copy link
Contributor Author

tmacro commented Dec 18, 2025

/approve

@bert-e
Copy link
Contributor

bert-e commented Dec 18, 2025

I have successfully merged the changeset of this pull request
into targetted development branches:

  • ✔️ development/9.2

The following branches have NOT changed:

  • development/7.10
  • development/7.4
  • development/7.70
  • development/8.8
  • development/9.0
  • development/9.1

Please check the status of the associated issue CLDSRV-797.

Goodbye tmacro.

The following options are set: approve

@bert-e bert-e merged commit d761a3a into development/9.2 Dec 18, 2025
29 checks passed
@bert-e bert-e deleted the improvement/CLDSRV-797/omit_internal_services_from_rate_limit branch December 18, 2025 16:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants