-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.2k
don't use no_main and no_core to test IBT #149969
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
jyn514
wants to merge
1
commit into
rust-lang:main
Choose a base branch
from
jyn514:ibt
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
+11
−9
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Collaborator
Collaborator
|
Member
Author
|
shhh rustbot i promise i tested it on a newer branch |
jieyouxu
approved these changes
Dec 14, 2025
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Member
|
@bors r+ |
Collaborator
cyrgani
reviewed
Dec 14, 2025
Member
Collaborator
also assert that the property is IBT and not some random other property.
Member
Author
|
@bors r=jieyouxu |
Collaborator
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 14, 2025
don't use no_main and no_core to test IBT The previous test was quite fragile and depended on a bunch of internal features. Simplify it. Split out of rust-lang#149937. cc `@jieyouxu` `@Oneirical`
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 14, 2025
don't use no_main and no_core to test IBT The previous test was quite fragile and depended on a bunch of internal features. Simplify it. Split out of rust-lang#149937. cc ``@jieyouxu`` ``@Oneirical``
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 14, 2025
Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - #146794 (std: reorganize pipe implementations) - #148196 (Implement create_dir_all() to operate iteratively instead of recursively) - #148490 (dangling pointer from temp cleanup) - #149864 (std: Don't use `linkat` on the `wasm32-wasi*` targets) - #149885 (replace addr_of_mut with &raw mut in maybeuninit docs) - #149949 (Cleanup of attribute parsing errors) - #149969 (don't use no_main and no_core to test IBT) Failed merges: - #148847 (Share Timespec between Unix and Hermit) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
A-run-make
Area: port run-make Makefiles to rmake.rs
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The previous test was quite fragile and depended on a bunch of internal features. Simplify it.
Split out of #149937.
cc @jieyouxu @Oneirical