Support local running of "conda-forge-tick --dry-run auto-tick"

[chrisburr]

Description:

Add support for running the auto-tick command locally.
I also added the option to passing a regex to only run the migrators which are of interest as well as a --no-update-graph to make debugging faster.

If you'd rather not have this PR merged, I don't mind if it's closed, 95% of the work was needed for debugging something else 😄

Checklist:

• Pydantic model updated or no update needed

Cross-refs, links to issues, etc:

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 29.16667% with 17 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 75.72%. Comparing base (96385b6) to head (2f10994).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
conda_forge_tick/make_migrators.py	9.09%	10 Missing ⚠️
conda_forge_tick/auto_tick.py	22.22%	7 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3680      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   77.36%   75.72%   -1.65%     
==========================================
  Files         134      134              
  Lines       14814    14825      +11     
==========================================
- Hits        11461    11226     -235     
- Misses       3353     3599     +246     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[ytausch]

Thank you!

Let me reference #2815 here, which also adds selecting migrators for auto-tick (but is blocked by outstanding reviews)

[beckermr]

Yeah I have been slow to review here sorry. Why is one PR so much bigger than the other? This one is tiny and very easy to review.

[ytausch]

My PR is outdated and eventually builds upon this one: #2813 (which is very short and also includes tests).

The line changes come from the linked PR in between (#2814) which allows to run make-migrators (which is needed for auto-tick) locally too.

If you want to review #2813 (to start clearing up the backlog), I can update it. Was waiting for a review on the integration tests first. (because they also secure these changes)

[chrisburr]

What's the prefered plan here? Should I finish this up with tests or shall we go with #2815?

[beckermr]

Thanks for the pr. Let's merge as is and we can combine with other prs later.