Skip to content

style(file-list-actions): use m3 buttons instead of linear layout#16601

Draft
alperozturk96 wants to merge 2 commits intomasterfrom
change-file-list-action-style
Draft

style(file-list-actions): use m3 buttons instead of linear layout#16601
alperozturk96 wants to merge 2 commits intomasterfrom
change-file-list-action-style

Conversation

@alperozturk96
Copy link
Collaborator

Changes

Uses M3 Icon button instead of LinearLayout
Changes tap animation

Before

before.mp4

After

after.mp4

@alperozturk96
Copy link
Collaborator Author

{DCE4C885-98C9-4858-A592-0E4514569069}

Signed-off-by: alperozturk96 <alper_ozturk@proton.me>
Signed-off-by: alperozturk96 <alper_ozturk@proton.me>
@alperozturk96 alperozturk96 force-pushed the change-file-list-action-style branch from 566d35b to 9b37a93 Compare February 27, 2026 14:51
for (creator in directEditing.creators.values) {
val creatorViewBinding =
FileListActionsBottomSheetCreatorBinding.inflate(layoutInflater)
val creatorButton = MaterialButton(
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@alperozturk96 alperozturk96 Feb 27, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How can I test all possible creator buttons? @tobiasKaminsky

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd say it the fab on root level of production can be considered "good enough"

@github-actions
Copy link

Codacy

SpotBugs

CategoryBaseNew
Bad practice4242
Correctness7575
Dodgy code253253
Experimental11
Internationalization77
Malicious code vulnerability22
Multithreaded correctness3434
Performance4343
Security1818
Total475475

@github-actions
Copy link

APK file: https://www.kaminsky.me/nc-dev/android-artifacts/16601.apk

qrcode

To test this change/fix you can simply download above APK file and install and test it in parallel to your existing Nextcloud app.

@github-actions
Copy link

blue-Light-Screenshot test failed, but no output was generated. Maybe a preliminary stage failed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants