-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
Update Password Secure integration instructions to match more recent Community post. #84
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Pull Request Review: Password Secure Integration Documentation UpdateSummaryThis PR significantly expands the Password Secure integration documentation from a basic 4-step connector setup to a comprehensive 170-line guide covering both Password Secure and NPS configuration with detailed step-by-step instructions and visual aids. Positive AspectsDocumentation Quality
Content Improvements
Issues and ConcernsCritical Issues1. Missing Step 2 in API Key GenerationLines 27-33 show Step 1 with an image, followed by another image, then jump to Step 3. Step 2 is missing its description. Add the missing Step 2 description between the images or clarify if the second image is just an additional view of Step 1. 2. Grammar Error in SDK Section (line 185)"The integration uses a Password Secure SDK DLL files" - Subject-verb agreement error. Change to "The integration uses Password Secure SDK DLL files" or "The integration uses a Password Secure SDK DLL" 3. Grammar Error in SDK Section (line 186)"The DLLs shipped with NPS is compatible" - Should be "The DLLs shipped with NPS are compatible" Documentation Consistency Issues4. Step Formatting InconsistencyThe document uses both em-dash and hyphen for step formatting. Other integration docs (CyberArk, BYOV) use em-dash consistently. For consistency with the repository, use em-dash throughout. 5. Unclear Note in API Key Section (lines 48-50)The note about token regeneration is confusing and redundant. Clarify whether both old and new tokens remain valid. Minor Issues6. Missing Context for "Advanced" Section (line 112)"Skip Certificate Check" is presented as a required step, but should include security implications and when it's appropriate to use. 7. Vague "Important Notes" Section (lines 179-181)The section is too generic. Either expand with specific verification steps or remove it entirely as the SDK section below is more actionable. Security Considerations8. API Key Storage Warning Could Be StrongerAdd emphasis on secure storage, access control for service accounts, and audit logging considerations. Code Quality AssessmentThis is a documentation-only change (Markdown + images):
Testing Recommendations
Recommendations SummaryMust Fix (Blocking)
Should Fix (Quality)
Overall AssessmentThis is a significant improvement to the documentation that transforms a minimal setup guide into a comprehensive reference. The changes are well-intentioned and add substantial value. The issues identified are primarily editorial (grammar, consistency) rather than technical errors. Recommendation: Approve with requested changes (fix grammar errors and missing step) before merge. Great work on expanding this documentation! The addition of visual aids and end-to-end workflow will significantly help users successfully complete this integration. |
Pull Request Review: Password Secure Integration Documentation UpdateOverviewThis PR significantly expands the Password Secure integration documentation from a basic connector setup guide (15 lines removed) to a comprehensive end-to-end integration guide (172 lines added). The update includes detailed prerequisites, step-by-step configuration instructions, visual aids, and architectural diagrams. ✅ StrengthsDocumentation Quality
Content Improvements
🔍 Issues & RecommendationsHigh Priority1. Title Inconsistency (Line 1 vs Line 7)
2. Inconsistent Naming Throughout Document
3. Internal Link Format Issue (Line 147)
4. Security Concern: Skip Certificate Check (Line 114)
Medium Priority5. Ambiguous Token Regeneration Info (Lines 50-52)
6. Missing Information
7. Image Path Inconsistency
8. Hardcoded Path Needs Context (Line 190)
Low Priority9. Minor Grammar/Style Issues
🔒 Security ReviewConcerns Identified:
Recommendations:
📝 SummaryThis is a significant improvement to the documentation that transforms a minimal setup guide into a comprehensive integration manual. The content is well-structured and informative. Before Merging:
Recommendation: Request changes to fix the high-priority issues (broken links, security guidance) before merging. Medium and low priority items can be addressed in follow-up PRs if needed. Overall Assessment: Approve with changes requested for critical issues (links, security context). This is quality documentation that will significantly help users with this integration. |
No description provided.