Skip to content

release note on user count is posted#1601

Merged
AndraMeer merged 3 commits intomainfrom
andram/user-count-update-release-note
Mar 5, 2026
Merged

release note on user count is posted#1601
AndraMeer merged 3 commits intomainfrom
andram/user-count-update-release-note

Conversation

@AndraMeer
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@cloudflare-workers-and-pages
Copy link

cloudflare-workers-and-pages bot commented Mar 5, 2026

Deploying dev-site with  Cloudflare Pages  Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit: d2a5b74
Status: ✅  Deploy successful!
Preview URL: https://699979a0.dev-site-4ua.pages.dev
Branch Preview URL: https://andram-user-count-update-rel.dev-site-4ua.pages.dev

View logs

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces a new release note across both GeoIP and minFraud documentation. The note informs users about upcoming daily updates to user count data for residential proxies, which will result in more frequent reporting of 0 or 1 values. This change is intended to help users better identify anomalous activity related to residential proxies.

Highlights

  • New Release Note Added: A new release note titled "Updates to user count data" has been added to both the GeoIP and minFraud documentation.
  • User Count Data Updates: The release note announces daily updates to user count data for residential proxies, aiming to return values of 0 or 1 more frequently. This change is effective between March 3 and March 6, 2026, and possibly longer.
  • Impact on Anomaly Detection: The update is designed to make it easier to flag a high volume of customer profiles on a residential proxy as anomalous when associated with lower user count values (0 or 1).
  • User Count Explanation: The release note includes a table explaining the different user count values (0, 1, 2, >5) and their descriptions, along with a link to a relevant Knowledge Base article.
Changelog
  • content/geoip/release-notes/2026.md
    • Added a new release note entry for "Updates to user count data" dated 2026-03-04, detailing changes to residential proxy user count reporting.
  • content/minfraud/release-notes/2026.md
    • Added a new release note entry for "Updates to user count data" dated 2026-03-04, detailing changes to residential proxy user count reporting.
Activity
  • No specific activity (comments, reviews, or progress updates) has been recorded for this pull request.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request adds a new release note about updates to user count data for both GeoIP and minFraud products. My review focuses on ensuring the new content adheres to the repository's documentation style guide. I have added a few comments to improve the robustness of links.

Note: Security Review has been skipped due to the limited scope of the PR.

| 2 | IP shared with multiple end-users. |
| >5 | IP shared with many end-users. |

[Learn more about user counts on our Knowledge Base.](/knowledge-base/articles/maxmind-user-context-data#:~:text=/traits/static_ip_score-,User%20counts,few%2C%20or%20many%20different%20users)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The link to the Knowledge Base uses a text fragment (:~:text=...), which can be brittle. If the text on the target page changes, the link may break or point to the wrong location. It's more robust to use a permanent anchor. Based on other documentation files, it appears #user-counts is the intended anchor.

Suggested change
[Learn more about user counts on our Knowledge Base.](/knowledge-base/articles/maxmind-user-context-data#:~:text=/traits/static_ip_score-,User%20counts,few%2C%20or%20many%20different%20users)
[Learn more about user counts on our Knowledge Base.](/knowledge-base/articles/maxmind-user-context-data#user-counts)
References
  1. The repository style guide requires ensuring the correctness of cross-references and links (line 12) and preferring explicit links (line 146). Using a stable anchor instead of a brittle text fragment makes the link more robust and maintainable. (link)

| 2 | IP shared with multiple end-users. |
| >5 | IP shared with many end-users. |

[Learn more about user counts on our Knowledge Base.](/knowledge-base/articles/ip-trait-risk-data-minfraud#:~:text=/traits/static_ip_score-,User%20counts,few%2C%20or%20many%20different%20users)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The link to the Knowledge Base uses a text fragment (:~:text=...), which can be brittle. If the text on the target page changes, the link may break or point to the wrong location. It's more robust to use a permanent anchor. It is likely that #user-counts is the intended anchor for this page as well.

Suggested change
[Learn more about user counts on our Knowledge Base.](/knowledge-base/articles/ip-trait-risk-data-minfraud#:~:text=/traits/static_ip_score-,User%20counts,few%2C%20or%20many%20different%20users)
[Learn more about user counts on our Knowledge Base.](/knowledge-base/articles/ip-trait-risk-data-minfraud#user-counts)
References
  1. The repository style guide requires ensuring the correctness of cross-references and links (line 12) and preferring explicit links (line 146). Using a stable anchor instead of a brittle text fragment makes the link more robust and maintainable. (link)

Andra Mircioiu added 2 commits March 4, 2026 16:18
Copy link
Contributor

@mm-jpoole mm-jpoole left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!! 🥳

@AndraMeer AndraMeer merged commit 3302f13 into main Mar 5, 2026
10 checks passed
@AndraMeer AndraMeer deleted the andram/user-count-update-release-note branch March 5, 2026 00:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants