feat: Add support for 'isoyear' in date_part function#19821
Merged
alamb merged 2 commits intoapache:mainfrom Jan 16, 2026
Merged
feat: Add support for 'isoyear' in date_part function#19821alamb merged 2 commits intoapache:mainfrom
alamb merged 2 commits intoapache:mainfrom
Conversation
Merged
Jefffrey
approved these changes
Jan 15, 2026
Contributor
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Which issue does this PR close?
Rationale for this change
isoyearpart is available in both PG and Spark EXTRACT functions.https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/functions-datetime.html#:~:text=the%20week%20numbering.-,isoyear,-The%20ISO%208601
https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/a03bedb6c1281c5263a42bfd20608d2ee005ab05/sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/datetimeExpressions.scala#L3360
What changes are included in this PR?
Support for part
isoyearin date_part function.Are these changes tested?
yes in SLT
Are there any user-facing changes?
yes