Skip to content

ci: remove Java Iceberg integration tests from CI [iceberg]#3673

Draft
andygrove wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom
andygrove:deprecate-java-iceberg-ci
Draft

ci: remove Java Iceberg integration tests from CI [iceberg]#3673
andygrove wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom
andygrove:deprecate-java-iceberg-ci

Conversation

@andygrove
Copy link
Member

Which issue does this PR close?

N/A - CI cleanup.

Rationale for this change

The Java-based Iceberg integration is being deprecated in favor of the Rust-based integration. The Java Iceberg CI jobs are no longer needed.

What changes are included in this PR?

Removes the three Java-based Iceberg CI jobs from iceberg_spark_test.yml:

  • iceberg-spark (used setup-iceberg-builder)
  • iceberg-spark-extensions (used setup-iceberg-builder)
  • iceberg-spark-runtime (used setup-iceberg-builder)

The three Rust-based Iceberg CI jobs are kept:

  • iceberg-spark-rust (uses setup-iceberg-rust-builder)
  • iceberg-spark-extensions-rust (uses setup-iceberg-rust-builder)
  • iceberg-spark-runtime-rust (uses setup-iceberg-rust-builder)

The shared build-native job is also retained.

How are these changes tested?

CI-only change. The remaining Rust Iceberg jobs will continue to run on PRs with [iceberg] in the title.

The Java-based Iceberg integration is being deprecated in favor of the
Rust-based integration. Remove the iceberg-spark, iceberg-spark-extensions,
and iceberg-spark-runtime CI jobs, keeping only the Rust variants.
Copy link
Contributor

@mbutrovich mbutrovich left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Makes sense to me. Thanks @andygrove!

@andygrove
Copy link
Member Author

I will wait until the 0.14.0 release branch has been created before merging this one

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants