Fix Cross zone templates registration for Edge Zones

[vishesh92]

Description

This PR fixes the registration of existing Cross Zone templates for Edge Zone.
This PR also offloads the filtering of cross zones to the database.

Details

This pull request refactors how cross-zone VM templates are handled and associated with zones. The main improvement is the introduction of a new DAO method, listAllCrossZoneTemplates(), which streamlines and centralizes the retrieval of cross-zone templates. This change eliminates repeated filtering logic across the codebase and makes the association process more efficient and maintainable. Additionally, the pull request updates the logic for associating these templates with zones, particularly in scenarios involving Edge Zones.

DAO and Data Access Improvements:

• Added the listAllCrossZoneTemplates() method to the VMTemplateDao interface and its implementation, allowing efficient retrieval of only cross-zone templates without manual filtering. [1] [2] [3]
• Updated the DAO search builder to include the crossZone property for filtering templates.

Refactoring Template Association Logic:

• Replaced manual filtering of cross-zone templates in multiple locations (TemplateServiceImpl, SimulatorDiscoverer, SecondaryStorageDiscoverer, and StorageManagerImpl) with calls to the new listAllCrossZoneTemplates() method, simplifying and unifying the logic. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]

Edge Zone Handling:

• Modified ConfigurationManagerImpl to associate cross-zone templates with Edge Zones immediately upon creation, since Edge Zones do not have SSVMs to trigger this association later.

Dependency Injection and Imports:

• Injected the TemplateService into ConfigurationManagerImpl to support the new association logic and added the necessary import. [1] [2]

Types of changes

• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
• Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
• Build/CI
• Test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

• Major
• Minor

Bug Severity

• BLOCKER
• Critical
• Major
• Minor
• Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

[vishesh92]

@blueorangutan package

[blueorangutan]

@vishesh92 a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

[blueorangutan]

Packaging result [SF]: ✖️ el8 ✖️ el9 ✖️ debian ✖️ suse15. SL-JID 17221

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 3.70%. Comparing base (e93ae1a) to head (6a5b9b6).
⚠️ Report is 10 commits behind head on 4.22.

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (e93ae1a) and HEAD (6a5b9b6). Click for more details.

HEAD has 1 upload less than BASE

Flag	BASE (e93ae1a)	HEAD (6a5b9b6)
unittests	1	0

Additional details and impacted files

@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##               4.22   #12874       +/-   ##
=============================================
- Coverage     17.61%    3.70%   -13.91%     
=============================================
  Files          5917      448     -5469     
  Lines        531430    38042   -493388     
  Branches      64973     7038    -57935     
=============================================
- Hits          93586     1409    -92177     
+ Misses       427288    36446   -390842     
+ Partials      10556      187    -10369     

Flag	Coverage Δ
uitests	3.70% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
unittests	?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[vishesh92]

@blueorangutan package

[blueorangutan]

@vishesh92 a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

[blueorangutan]

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 17222

[sureshanaparti]

clgtm

[vishesh92]

@blueorangutan test keepEnv

[blueorangutan]

@vishesh92 a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests

[blueorangutan]

[SF] Trillian Build Failed (tid-15725)

[blueorangutan]

[SF] Trillian test result (tid-15728)
Environment: kvm-ol9 (x2), zone: Advanced Networking with Mgmt server ol9
Total time taken: 57991 seconds
Marvin logs: https://github.com/blueorangutan/acs-prs/releases/download/trillian/pr12874-t15728-kvm-ol9.zip
Smoke tests completed. 148 look OK, 1 have errors, 0 did not run
Only failed and skipped tests results shown below:

Test	Result	Time (s)	Test File
ContextSuite context=TestSharedNetworkWithConfigDrive>:setup	Error	50.50	test_network.py

[vishesh92]

@blueorangutan package

[blueorangutan]

@vishesh92 a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress.

[blueorangutan]

Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 17281