Skip to content

Conversation

@westonruter
Copy link
Member

Trac ticket: https://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/64404


This Pull Request is for code review only. Please keep all other discussion in the Trac ticket. Do not merge this Pull Request. See GitHub Pull Requests for Code Review in the Core Handbook for more details.

@github-actions
Copy link

Test using WordPress Playground

The changes in this pull request can previewed and tested using a WordPress Playground instance.

WordPress Playground is an experimental project that creates a full WordPress instance entirely within the browser.

Some things to be aware of

  • The Plugin and Theme Directories cannot be accessed within Playground.
  • All changes will be lost when closing a tab with a Playground instance.
  • All changes will be lost when refreshing the page.
  • A fresh instance is created each time the link below is clicked.
  • Every time this pull request is updated, a new ZIP file containing all changes is created. If changes are not reflected in the Playground instance,
    it's possible that the most recent build failed, or has not completed. Check the list of workflow runs to be sure.

For more details about these limitations and more, check out the Limitations page in the WordPress Playground documentation.

Test this pull request with WordPress Playground.

@westonruter westonruter marked this pull request as ready for review December 14, 2025 22:29
@github-actions
Copy link

The following accounts have interacted with this PR and/or linked issues. I will continue to update these lists as activity occurs. You can also manually ask me to refresh this list by adding the props-bot label.

Core Committers: Use this line as a base for the props when committing in SVN:

Props westonruter.

To understand the WordPress project's expectations around crediting contributors, please review the Contributor Attribution page in the Core Handbook.


// Now we try to get it from the saved interval in case the schedule disappears.
if ( 0 === $interval ) {
if ( 0 === (int) $interval ) {
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This will be true when the $interval is false. I'm not sure if that is desirable or not.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

When this function eventually falls through to wp_schedule_event() the following code is run:

// Make sure timestamp is a positive integer.
if ( ! is_numeric( $timestamp ) || $timestamp <= 0 ) {
if ( $wp_error ) {
return new WP_Error(
'invalid_timestamp',
__( 'Event timestamp must be a valid Unix timestamp.' )
);
}
return false;
}

This will change the behavior if the interval has been changed to false in wp_get_schedules() in an attempt to prevent the rescheduling of events so is probably undesirable.

__( 'Event schedule does not exist.' )
sprintf(
/* translators: %s is the interval encoded as JSON */
__( 'Event schedule is invalid. Interval must be positive integer, but got: %s' ),
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe the $recurrence should be included here as well?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this would be good if a named schedule is used, ie if the code doesn't fall back to

// Now we try to get it from the saved interval in case the schedule disappears.
if ( 0 === $interval ) {
$scheduled_event = wp_get_scheduled_event( $hook, $args, $timestamp );
if ( $scheduled_event && isset( $scheduled_event->interval ) ) {
$interval = $scheduled_event->interval;
}
}

Copy link
Contributor

@peterwilsoncc peterwilsoncc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've added a few notes inline.


// Now we try to get it from the saved interval in case the schedule disappears.
if ( 0 === $interval ) {
if ( 0 === (int) $interval ) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

When this function eventually falls through to wp_schedule_event() the following code is run:

// Make sure timestamp is a positive integer.
if ( ! is_numeric( $timestamp ) || $timestamp <= 0 ) {
if ( $wp_error ) {
return new WP_Error(
'invalid_timestamp',
__( 'Event timestamp must be a valid Unix timestamp.' )
);
}
return false;
}

This will change the behavior if the interval has been changed to false in wp_get_schedules() in an attempt to prevent the rescheduling of events so is probably undesirable.


// Now we assume something is wrong and fail to schedule.
if ( 0 === $interval ) {
if ( ! is_int( $interval ) || $interval <= 0 ) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
if ( ! is_int( $interval ) || $interval <= 0 ) {
if ( ! is_numeric( $interval ) || $interval <= 0 ) {

Matches the behaivour of the existing check in wp_schedule_event()

__( 'Event schedule does not exist.' )
sprintf(
/* translators: %s is the interval encoded as JSON */
__( 'Event schedule is invalid. Interval must be positive integer, but got: %s' ),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this would be good if a named schedule is used, ie if the code doesn't fall back to

// Now we try to get it from the saved interval in case the schedule disappears.
if ( 0 === $interval ) {
$scheduled_event = wp_get_scheduled_event( $hook, $args, $timestamp );
if ( $scheduled_event && isset( $scheduled_event->interval ) ) {
$interval = $scheduled_event->interval;
}
}

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants