Skip to content

Conversation

@natalia-amorim
Copy link
Contributor

@natalia-amorim natalia-amorim commented Dec 29, 2025

Changes

First post in a proposed "recipe" blog series, which will be a set of high-level, SEO- and LLM-friendly tutorials styled as cooking recipes. Each one tackles a universal product problem in a structured but playful format.

Why this format?

  • SEO: Targets problem-based queries ("how to fix onboarding") instead of tool queries, which we've saturated
  • AEO: Structured format plays well with LLMs
  • Product storytelling: Shows PostHog tools working together naturally
  • Actually useful: Tool-agnostic advice with PostHog-specific tips in collapsibles – helpful even if you don't use PostHog, more helpful if you do
  • It's weird, fun, easily re-packageable into graphics for social, and our competitors aren't doing anything similar

The long game (in the spirit of #do-more-weird): If this works, we can eventually build out a "PostHog Cookbook", a collection of recipes organized by goal or product area. Same structure across all posts makes it easy to navigate, internally link, and reuse for SEO/AEO. We can have fun with the visuals and presentation of it!

For reviewers

This is an intentional format experiment. Would love feedback on:

  • Tone: too playful? Not enough?
  • Balance between generic advice and PostHog-specific implementation
  • Whether the structure feels reusable for future recipes
  • Any features or product info misrepresented?
  • Too high-level or too in the weeds?
  • Missing any critical steps or information?
  • Do the internal links make sense?

P.S. Haven't had time to do the art request yet! Any images added are placeholders for now!

Checklist

  • Words are spelled using American English
  • PostHog product names are in title case. It's "Product Analytics" not "Product analytics". If talking about a category of product, use sentence case e.g. "There are a lot of product analytics tools, but PostHog's Product Analytics is the best"
  • Titles are in sentence case
  • Feature names are in sentence case. It's "Click here to create a trend insight" not "... create a Trend Insight" and so on.
  • Use relative URLs for internal links
  • If I moved a page, I added a redirect in vercel.json

Article checklist

  • I've added (at least) 3-5 internal links to this new article
  • I've added keywords for this page to the rank tracker in Ahrefs
  • I've checked the preview build of the article
  • The date on the article is today's date
  • I've added this to the relevant "Tutorials and guides" docs page (if applicable)

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Dec 29, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Review Updated (UTC)
posthog Ready Ready Preview Jan 6, 2026 10:31am

@natalia-amorim
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @rafaeelaudibert may I interest you in a side quest, sir?

I’m experimenting with a new blog post format – SEO/LLM tutorials as "cooking recipes” (this one’s about debugging onboarding drop-offs). It’s meant to be high-level and tool-agnostic, with PostHog-specific tips layered in. The goal is something that's actually fun to read while still packing in useful information and clear next steps :)

Would love your growth brain on this when you have a sec.

Hoping to get your POV on the copy, especially if I missed anything important or got something wrong in the steps or suggestions. Totally fine if you only have time for high-level feedback.

Obrigadaaaa 🙏

@natalia-amorim
Copy link
Contributor Author

@gewenyu99 FYI since you're an ✨actual cook✨

Copy link
Member

This is very fun! I don't have a lot of feedback here on whether it reads like a real recipe - will leave that to the content folks, you know that much better than I do - but I feel like this would be waaaay more Posthog-y if we could change the UI to look more like a recipe book. Right now it just feels like a blogpost formatted differently vs. having something that's actually a recipe.

To get this to a good place means some custom UI - similar to the one we have for the new docs page, with the step-by-step hog on the right walking you through the steps. It means people can check things off and write notes to it - like they would on an actual recipe book. It means being able to adjust the servings (this is more for fun, of course).

I also think the "If using PostHog" bits should be highlighted more? I know we wanna do something generic, but we're selling PostHog at the end of the day, and we should drive people to use it. Maybe include a more prominent callout - "did you know using posthog oven means your recipe will be ready 50% faster when compared to the leading ovens in the market right now? data source: my head". Making it quirky is fun, but get people to sign up!

@natalia-amorim
Copy link
Contributor Author

This is very fun! I don't have a lot of feedback here on whether it reads like a real recipe - will leave that to the content folks, you know that much better than I do - but I feel like this would be waaaay more Posthog-y if we could change the UI to look more like a recipe book. Right now it just feels like a blogpost formatted differently vs. having something that's actually a recipe.

Yeah I hear you but this is still very much so a proof of concept (ultimately still needs to validate whether this will perform well with SEO/LLMs or not), so I think it's a tall order to get any UI changes done before we know this is worth investing time/energy into. ATM we're barely at a point where the actual blog and newsletter pages look and behave like we want them to, so this might be a secondary (or tertiary) ask once we get some other ducks in a row

That said I do love how this page looks/behaves and think it's the perfect template for something like this https://posthog.com/docs/error-tracking/start-here#quest-item-monitor-and-resolve-issues, I'm just unsure if we can replicate that in the blog as of right now

I also think the "If using PostHog" bits should be highlighted more? I know we wanna do something generic, but we're selling PostHog at the end of the day, and we should drive people to use it. Maybe include a more prominent callout - "did you know using posthog oven means your recipe will be ready 50% faster when compared to the leading ovens in the market right now? data source: my head". Making it quirky is fun, but get people to sign up!

Yeah because these are upper funnel pieces it's a delicate balance making sure they also very much so serve the "general population", but I also hear you on this being light on call to actions. Will give it some more thought this week!

Tyyy @rafaeelaudibert

Copy link
Contributor

@gewenyu99 gewenyu99 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is super cool. Love how you're leaning into recipes, super unique feel here.

I do feel like we're not leaning into that whole recipe bit hard enough toward the middle of this post. Maybe adding these in consistently with formatting can help:

  • Time expected for each step
  • How to tell if each step is successful
  • The chef's tips bits, but as a consistent recurring theme
  • Checklist to review steps start/finish


</details>

By the end of Step 5, you should be able to say "Users drop off here because *[this thing]* keeps happening."
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Again I think consistent format for checking how you know you've d1one this step successfully (maybe a quote block box or callout box with consistent format) will be super useful

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@natalia-amorim
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ivanagas Heya!! Over the holidays I was thinking about SEO/LLM content – both finding different topics I'm excited to write about (beyond just tools/alternatives, which are a bit saturated), and our more recent conversations about developing consistent content series.

I came up with this recipe-style tutorial format; the idea is to frame tutorials like cooking recipes, and it's meant to be fun and weird and a bit tongue-in-cheek while still being genuinely helpful – something that stands out from typical tutorial content. Once we nail the template, I can scale it across different themes and products

Here's a draft of the first one for review :)

Copy link
Contributor

@ivanagas ivanagas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this is looking good, it's definitely a fun format. I would just say:

  1. Let's make sure we're clear about the keyword we want to rank for and it's traffic. I realize there is a lot of good stuff in here for LLMs but search traffic should still be our primary signal until we have better data about LLM usage.
  2. Be careful about overdoing it with the fun bits, I think you're right on the edge in terms of the metaphor (but it works), while you might be a bit over(cooked 😉) in terms of fun components and this takes away from the actual content.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What is the keyword we are trying to rank for here? "Onboarding drop off" and "how to fix onboarding" seem to have no traffic but maybe I'm missing something. "Onboarding" seems to be all about employee onboarding, so would be a bit tough to rank for.

3. `first_project_created`
4. `teammate_invited` (the last step is your activation event)

A few tips:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there a tip to add here that you need to capture an event before it can be included in the funnel? It is sort of implied that you can create a funnel before you capture data.


There’s no universal benchmark.

For self-serve SaaS, **20–40%** onboarding completion is common. Higher-touch products with sales involvement often see higher rates.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Source? hehe, it's ok if not

Comment on lines +500 to +503
- [10 things we've learned about A/B testing](https://newsletter.posthog.com/p/10-things-weve-learned-about-ab-testing)
- [How to think like a growth engineer](/newsletter/think-like-a-growth-engineer)
- [What we've learned about talking to users](/blog/product-for-engineers-1)
- [50 things we've learned about building successful products](https://newsletter.posthog.com/p/50-things-weve-learned-about-building)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

*It's like attempting a beef wellington, realizing you're in over your head somewhere around the "wrap the beef in mushroom duxelles" step, and bailing to order pizza instead. Ask me how I know.*

**Even better news**: onboarding friction is measurable, debuggable, and fixable.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Although this is fun, I think it might be a bit much early on. We have a lot of fun components up front and this is the one I'd pick to remove. It's just a bit too long before we get to the meat of the article.

The TLDR sort of feels like a repeat of "What you'll need" especially if you don't scroll.

Also, if you removed this, I don't think you'd need --- in every section which would help spacing a bit.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would stay keep the checkbox components but use them in the Ingredients section as a bit of fun rather than hiding them.

| **Difficulty** | Beginner-friendly |
| **Yields** | One less broken onboarding flow |
| **Best for** | Product engineers, technical founders, growth teams |
| **Outcome** | Identify where users drop off during onboarding, why it happens, and what to fix first. |
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe this is for here or maybe somewhere else, but do you want to touch on, why you should care about fixing this? Maybe as simple as one paragraph:

Better onboarding conversion boosts all downstream metrics from activation to retention to revenue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants