Skip to content

Conversation

@x-cubed
Copy link
Contributor

@x-cubed x-cubed commented Dec 1, 2025

We're soon to support SCIM APIs for automated user and group provisioning in Octopus Deploy, via the Microsoft Entra ID/Azure AD authentication provider.

This feature will require an enterprise license.

[sc-126951]

@x-cubed x-cubed self-assigned this Dec 1, 2025
@x-cubed x-cubed added the pending-release Items dependent on a downstream release of octopus or other item label Dec 1, 2025
@x-cubed x-cubed removed the pending-release Items dependent on a downstream release of octopus or other item label Jan 19, 2026
@x-cubed x-cubed marked this pull request as ready for review January 19, 2026 02:22

:::div{.hint}

If you can't see an option for **Enable SCIM** in the **Azure AD** settings, check that you're running a recent version of Octopus Deploy and that you have an enterprise license.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nit: "an Enterprise licence" should be capitalized?


:::

Octopus Deploy supports [SCIM](./) 2 as a feature of the Azure AD authentication provider. This allows users and groups created and managed in Entra ID to be synchronized with users and teams in Octopus Deploy, rather than manually provisioning users or provisioning them just-in-time via **Allow Auto User Creation**.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thought: I think the docco should either:

  • use "Azure AD authentication" everywhere to match what it says in Octopus (and we'll change the docco when we update it in the software), or
  • use "Entra ID authentication" everywhere because that's what we want it to be in future, maybe using "Azure AD authentication" when referring to specific UI elements

Copy link
Contributor

@steve-fenton-octopus steve-fenton-octopus left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants