Add support for phase param to custom models#542
Merged
chrarnoldus merged 6 commits intomainfrom Feb 25, 2026
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
Code Review SummaryStatus: 7 Issues Found | Recommendation: Address before merge Fix these issues in Kilo Cloud Overview
Issue Details (click to expand)WARNING
SUGGESTION
Files Reviewed (6 files)
|
jeanduplessis
approved these changes
Feb 25, 2026
92af777 to
864648f
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a hacky way purely to benchmark GPT-5.3-Codex. It will be properly implemented in the client when OpenRouter, Vercel AI SDK etc support it.
I am assuming the model will never emit the same text twice in the same task with different phases, but that sounds reasonable to me.