chore(deps): update github/codeql-action digest to 6bc82e0

[renovate]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
github/codeql-action (changelog)	action	digest	cdefb33 → 6bc82e0

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 95.03%. Comparing base (992b231) to head (c4b38c2).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1351   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.03%   95.03%           
=======================================
  Files          43       43           
  Lines        2782     2782           
=======================================
  Hits         2644     2644           
  Misses        138      138           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[ZohebShaikh]

Does the codeql action provide any value ?

[tpoliaw]

It doesn't look like it has ever failed. What is it supposed to catch?

[ZohebShaikh]

I had another look at this, It does give some value for security we have disabled dependabot so it is not giving us PRs. Are there any plans to purchase the mend sca similar to what dependabot used to do or to re-enable dependabot ?

And CodeQL is very sophisticated tool which can be used to have our custom policy for example secret should be saved in SecretStr etc. But we have not written any CodeQL queries so it has never failed.