Skip to content

feat: improve readme #214

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
art049 merged 1 commit into from
Jan 23, 2026
Merged

feat: improve readme #214

art049 merged 1 commit into from
Jan 23, 2026

Conversation

@art049
Copy link
Member

@art049 art049 commented Jan 23, 2026

No description provided.

@art049 art049 requested a review from adriencaccia January 23, 2026 16:12
@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Jan 23, 2026 •
edited
Loading

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging this PR will not alter performance

Comparing even-better-readme (ca0c811) with main (3791031)1

Summary

✅ 4 untouched benchmarks

Footnotes

  1. No successful run was found on main (ca0c811) during the generation of this report, so 3791031 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

@art049 art049 force-pushed the even-better-readme branch from 529817f to 4819ce9 Compare January 23, 2026 16:18
@art049 art049 force-pushed the even-better-readme branch from 4819ce9 to ca0c811 Compare January 23, 2026 16:19
@art049 art049 merged commit ca0c811 into main Jan 23, 2026
6 checks passed
@art049 art049 deleted the even-better-readme branch January 23, 2026 16:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@adriencaccia adriencaccia Awaiting requested review from adriencaccia

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@art049